4.5 Review

Objectifying the Subjective: The Use of Heart Rate Variability as a Psychosocial Symptom Biomarker in Hospice and Palliative Care Research

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages E315-E321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.015

Keywords

Heart Rate Variability; Psychosocial; Biomarker; Palliative Care

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32HL125195, R01CA222486, R01CA225629, KL2TR000421]
  2. CureSearch for Children's Cancer
  3. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  4. Seattle Children's Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measuring psychosocial symptoms in hospice and palliative care research is crucial for understanding the patient and caregiver experience. Combining self-reported measures with objective biomarkers like heart rate variability can provide a more nuanced understanding of patients' physiological and perceived well-being.
Measuring psychosocial symptoms in hospice and palliative care research is critical to understanding the patient and caregiver experience. Subjective patient-reported outcome tools have been the primary method for collecting these data in palliative care, and the growing field of biobehavioral research offers new tools that could deepen our understanding of psychosocial symptomatology. Here we describe one psychosocial biomarker, heart rate variability (HRV), and simple techniques for measurement in an adolescent and young adult cancer population that are applicable to pa ilia live care studies. Complementing self-reported measures with objective biomarkers like HRV could facilitate a more nuanced understanding of physiologic and perceived well-being in patients with serious or lift-limning illness and inform future precision supportive care in hospice rend palliative medicine. (C) 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available