Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages 1402-1412Publisher
AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2020.9.JNS201798
Keywords
stroke; calcified cerebral emboli; endovascular treatment; vascular disorders; interventional neurosurgery
Categories
Funding
- TWIN Foundation
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Amsterdam UMC
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Based on the study findings, patients with CCE had lower reperfusion rates and less improvement on the NIHSS after EVT, but CCE were not significantly associated with worse functional outcomes or higher mortality rates. Therefore, EVT should still be considered in this specific group of patients.
OBJECTIVE Calcified cerebral emboli (CCE) are a rare cause of acute ischemic stroke. The authors aimed to assess the association of CCE with functional outcome, successful reperfusion, and mortality. Furthermore, they aimed to assess the effectiveness of intravenous alteplase treatment and endovascular treatment (EVT), as well as the best first-line EVT approach in patients with CCE. METHODS The Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry is a prospective, observational multicenter registry of patients treated with EVT for acute ischemic stroke in 16 intervention hospitals in the Netherlands. The association of CCE with functional outcome, reperfusion, and mortality was evaluated using logistic regression models. Univariable comparisons were made to determine the effectiveness of intravenous alteplase treatment and the best first-line EVT approach in CCE patients. RESULTS The study included 3077 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry. Fifty-five patients (1.8%) had CCE. CCE were not significantly associated with worse functional outcome (adjusted common OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.15), and 29% of CCE patients achieved functional independence. An extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score >= 2B was significantly less often achieved in CCE patients compared to non-CCE patients (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.28- 0.97). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 8 CCE patients (15%) vs 171 of 3022 non-CCE patients (6%; p = 0.01). The median improvement on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 2 in CCE patients versus 4 in non-CCE patients (p = 0.008). CCE were not significantly associated with mortality (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.64-2.12). Intravenous alteplase use in CCE patients was not associated with functional outcome or reperfusion. In CCE patients with successful reperfusion, stent retrievers were more often used as the primary treatment device (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS While patients with CCE had significantly lower reperfusion rates and less improvement on the NIHSS after EVT, CCE were not significantly associated with worse functional outcome or higher mortality rates. Therefore, EVT should still be considered in this specific group of patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available