4.7 Article

Blood neurofilament light chain and total tau levels at admission predict death in COVID-19 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 268, Issue 12, Pages 4436-4442

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10595-6

Keywords

Neurofilament light chain; GFAP; UCH-L1; Tau; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19

Funding

  1. IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
  2. Italian Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the clinical prognostic value of markers of neural tissue damage in predicting survival or transfer to ICU in patients infected with COVID-19. Results showed that certain markers were significantly increased in patients with fatal outcomes or needing ICU transfer, with total tau levels accurately predicting mortality. Blood neural markers may offer additional prognostic value for predicting COVID-19 outcomes.
Background and aims Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 range from asymptomatic, to mild, moderate or severe disease evolution including fatal outcome. Thus, early predictors of clinical outcome are highly needed. We investigated markers of neural tissue damage as a possible early sign of multisystem involvement to assess their clinical prognostic value on survival or transfer to intensive care unit (ICU). Methods We collected blood from 104 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 the day of admission to the emergency room and measured blood neurofilament light chair (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and total tau protein levels. Results We found that NfL, GFAP, and tau were significantly increased in patients with fatal outcome, while NfL and UCH-L1 in those needing ICU transfer. ROC and Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that total tau levels at admission accurately predict mortality. Conclusions Blood neural markers may provide additional prognostic value to conventional biomarkers used to predict COVID-19 outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available