4.2 Article

Cultural Identity Conflict and Psychological Well-Being in Bicultural Young Adults Do Self-Concept Clarity and Self-Esteem Matter?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 209, Issue 7, Pages 525-532

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001332

Keywords

Bicultural; cultural identity conflict; self-concept clarity; psychological well-being; satisfaction with life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a negative relationship between cultural identity conflict and psychological well-being, mediated by self-concept clarity and self-esteem. The results support the importance of interventions that foster the development of skills in bicultural young adults to promote psychological well-being.
The present study examined the relationship between cultural identity conflict and psychological well-being, as well as the role of self-concept clarity and self-esteem in mediating this linkage. Elevated cultural identity conflict was hypothesized to be associated with lower psychological well-being via both (lower) self-concept clarity and (lower) self-esteem, with self-concept clarity preceding self-esteem. In a cross-sectional design, 473 bicultural young adults (age range, 18-35) completed an online questionnaire assessing cultural identity conflict, self-concept clarity, self-esteem, emotional distress, psychopathological symptoms, and satisfaction with life. Correlation analyses revealed that elevated cultural identity conflict was positively associated with emotional distress and psychopathological symptoms, and negatively associated with satisfaction with life. Mediation analyses indicated that these associations were mediated by lower self-concept clarity and lower self-esteem. The results support the importance of interventions that foster the development of skills in bicultural young adults to obtain more self-concept clarity and promote self-esteem and psychological well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available