4.4 Article

Effective adsorption of A-series chemical warfare agents on graphdiyne nanoflake: a DFT study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-021-04730-3

Keywords

Graphdiyne nanoflake; Chemical warfare agents; DFT; QTAIM; SAPT; RDG

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the utility of graphdiyne (GDY) nanoflakes as an electrochemical sensor material for detecting hazardous chemical warfare agents (CWAs) such as A-230, A-232, and A-234. The adsorption of CWAs on GDY is explained within the density functional theory (DFT) framework, showing that analytes are physiosorbed onto GDY through noncovalent interactions. This noncovalent adsorption is attributed to dispersion factors dominating in the complexes among various noncovalent components.
Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) are highly poisonous and their presence may cause diverse effects not only on living organisms but also on environment. Therefore, their detection and removal in a short time span is very important. In this regard, here the utility of graphdiyne (GDY) nanoflake is studied theoretically as an electrochemical sensor material for the hazardous CWAs including A-230, A-232, and A-234. Herein, we explain the phenomenon of adsorption of A-series CWAs on GDY nanoflake within the density functional theory (DFT) framework. The characterisation of adsorption is based on optimised geometries, BSSE-corrected energies, SAPT0, RDG, FMO, CHELPG charge transfer, QTAIM and UV-Vis analyses. The calculated counterpoise adsorption energies for reported complexes range from - 13.70 to - 17.19 kcal mol(-1). These adsorption energies show that analytes are physiosorbed onto GDY which usually takes place through noncovalent interactions. The noncovalent adsorption of CWAs on GDY is also attributed by the SAPT0, RDG and QTAIM analyses. These properties also reveal that dispersion factors dominate in the complexes among many noncovalent components (exchange, induction, electrostatic, steric and repulsion). In order to estimate the sensitivity of GDY, the %sensitivity and average energy gap variations are quantitatively measured by energies of HOMO and LUMO orbitals. In terms of adsorption affinity of GDY, UV-Vis analysis, CHELPG charge transfer and DOS analyses depict an appreciable response towards these toxic CWAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available