4.7 Article

The surveillance of spike protein for patients with COVID-19 detected in Hong Kong in 2020

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages 5644-5647

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27063

Keywords

coronavirus; evolution; genetics; genetic variability; mutation; virus classification

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the mutations of the S protein in COVID-19 viruses in Hong Kong in 2020, finding that the majority of viruses had nonsynonymous substitutions. Some substitutions were only detected at specific time intervals. Continuous genetic surveillance is essential for early detection of mutations that increase infectivity.
In 2020, numerous fast-spreading severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have been reported. These variants had unusually high genetic changes in the spike (S) protein. In an attempt to understand the genetic background of SARS-CoV-2 viruses in Hong Kong, especially before vaccination, the purpose of this study is to summarize the S protein mutations detected among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Hong Kong in 2020. COVID-19 cases were selected every month in 2020. One virus from each case was analyzed. The full encoding region of the S proteins was sequenced. From January 2020 to December 2020, a total of 340 COVID-19 viruses were sequenced. The amino acids of the S protein for 44 (12.9%) were identical to the reference sequence, WIV04 (GenBank accession MN996528). For the remaining 296 sequences (87.1%), a total of 43 nonsynonymous substitution patterns were found. Of the nonsynonymous substitutions found, some of them were only detected at specific time intervals and then they disappeared. The ongoing genetic surveillance system is important. It would facilitate early detection of mutations that can increase infectivity as well as mutations that are selected for the virus to escape immunological restraint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available