Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 165-168Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106863
Keywords
genetic engineering; autonomy; human dignity; law; genethics
Funding
- National Research Foundation of South Africa [116275]
- African Health Research Flagship of the University of KwaZulu-Natal
Ask authors/readers for more resources
While WHO has established the Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing and published a Draft Governance Framework, there are four key areas of concern that need to be addressed: ensuring safety and efficacy, balancing global standard setting with state sovereignty, understanding varying conceptualizations of human dignity, and clarifying the meaning of harm to the interests of a future person. Addressing these concerns may lead to a promising future for the global governance of human genome editing.
WHO in 2019 established the Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing, which has recently published a Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing. Although the Draft Framework is a good point of departure, there are four areas of concern: first, it does not sufficiently address issues related to establishing safety and efficacy. Second, issues that are a source of tension between global standard setting and state sovereignty need to be addressed in a more nuanced fashion. Third, it fails to meaningfully engage with the extent to which the conceptualisation of human dignity may justifiably vary between jurisdictions. Fourth, the meaning of harm to the interests of a future person requires clarity. Provided these four areas of concern can be addressed, the future of the global governance of human genome editing may hold promise.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available