4.2 Article

Fetal speckle-tracking echocardiography: a comparison between two-dimensional and electronic spatio-temporal image correlation (e-STIC) technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 25, Pages 6090-6096

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1906855

Keywords

Echocardiography; fetal echocardiography; speckle tracking; strain; STIC; prenatal diagnosis; ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that the use of e-STIC technology can improve the reproducibility of ventricular deformation analysis, especially for left ventricular global strain. Additionally, e-STIC shows better reliability in measuring left ventricular ejection fraction compared to 2D analysis.
Background Speckle tracking technology has been applied to assess ventricular deformation throughout the cardiac cycle. An electronic four dimensional probe that allows rapid acquisition of electronic spatio-temporal image correlation volumes (eSTIC) has been recently introduced. Objectives The aim of our study was to investigate whether e-STIC acquisition improves deformation analyses reproducibility. Study design We recruited fetuses between 20 and 40 weeks of gestation. We obtained a 2D video clip and an e-STIC volume of a four-chamber view. We focused on left ventricular global strain (LV-GS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-FE). Intraobserver, interobserver and intermethod agreement were assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and illustrated by Bland-Altman plots. Systematic differences between measurements were assessed using a paired t-test. Results The mean difference between LV-GS values obtained with e-STIC and 2D analysis was -0.10 (95% CI -2.28, 2.08). No systematic differences were found between the two techniques for LV-GS values (p-value = .927). The mean difference between LV-FE values obtained with e-STIC and 2D analysis was 7.55 (95% CI 4.16, 10.95; p-value <.001). The inter-rater reliability of LV-GS was moderate-to-substantial for both e-STIC and 2D. The inter-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis. The intra-rater reliability of LV-GS obtained with e-STIC was superior to that obtained with 2D analysis (ICC 0.857; 95% IC 0.761-0.917). The intra-rater reliability of LV-FE obtained via e-STIC was superior to that obtained via 2D analysis (ICC 0.647; IC 0.51-0.783). Conclusions e-STIC seems to be a better technique than 2D analysis for intra-rater reliability of LV-GS. 4D acquisition might improve intrinsic limitations of speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available