4.4 Article

Species-specific and generic biomass equations for seedlings and saplings of European tree species

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 313-329

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-016-0937-z

Keywords

Juvenile tree biomass; Allometric equations; Forest regeneration

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) of the Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) [FKZ 3511 84 0200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomass equations are a helpful tool to estimate the tree and stand biomass production and standing stock. Such estimations are of great interest for science but also of great importance for global reports on the carbon cycle and the global climate system. Even though there are various collections and generic meta-analyses available with biomass equations for mature trees, reports on biomass equations for juvenile trees (seedlings and saplings) are mainly missing. Against the background of an increasing amount of reforestation and afforestation projects and forests in young successional stages, such equations are required. In this study we have collected data from various studies on the aboveground woody biomass of 19 common tree species growing in Europe. The aim of this paper was to calculate species-specific biomass equations for the aboveground woody biomass of single trees in dependence of root-collar-diameter (RCD), height (H) and the combination of the two (RCD2 H). Next to calculating species-specific biomass equations for the species available in the dataset, we also calculated generic biomass equations for all broadleaved species and all conifer species. The biomass equations should be a contribution to the pool of published biomass equations, whereas the novelty is here that the equations were exclusively derived for young trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available