4.6 Article

Preparation of hollow carbon rods by using ZnO as template for high-performance supercapacitor

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-05469-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772177]
  2. Shaanxi Science & Technology Co-ordination & Innovation Project of China [2017TSCXL-GY-08-05]
  3. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shaanxi Province [2018JC-029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supercapacitors, with their prominent advantages in energy storage applications, have increasingly gained attention, with carbon materials being the most commonly used due to their unique characteristics. Research has developed hollow carbon rods as a new carbon structure with superior performance potential, showing high specific capacitance and cycling stability in experiments, promising to improve supercapacitor performances.
Supercapacitors possess prominent advantages compared to traditional capacitors or batteries and have been increasingly attracting attentions for their application in energy storage. Carbon materials are the most highly used material for supercapacitors due to the unique characters. However, traditional carbon materials fail to meet up-to-date energy storage application, which requires to develop new carbon structure with superior performances. Herein, we developed a new hollow carbon rods (HCR) using ZnO@ZIF-8 rods as a template. We first achieved ZnO@ZIF-8 rods using ZnO as a template. Then, ZnO@ZIF-8 rods were transformed into ZnO@C, which was further transformed into HCR by removal of ZnO. The result shows that the HCR-800 exhibited high specific capacitance of 228.3 F/g and good cycling stability of retaining 96.51% after 10,000 cycles in 2 M KOH under -1-0 V at 1 A/g. Together, our newly developed HCR has unique structure and superior characteristics and is promising to improve the performances of supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available