4.6 Review

Physical mechanisms in hybrid additive manufacturing: A process design framework

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117048

Keywords

Hybrid additive manufacturing; Metal additive manufacturing; Manufacturing process chains

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1842165]
  2. Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship [N00014-19-1-2642]
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) -Center for Hierarchical Material Design (CHiMaD) [70NANB14H012]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) - Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) [CPS/CMMI-1646592]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study defines hybrid additive manufacturing as a combination of additive manufacturing process and secondary energy sources, altering physical mechanisms to influence material properties. Through a systematic approach, the study identified five physical mechanisms and analyzed over 100 papers to show the effects of mechanisms on material properties. Future research directions include improving energy source variety, material diversity, process chain integration, and developing promising hybrid additive manufacturing processes.
This study defined hybrid additive manufacturing (AM) as in-situ or series combination of an additive manufacturing process and secondary energy sources in which physical mechanisms are fundamentally altered/controlled to affect the resulting properties of material and/or part. This definition includes in-situ secondary processes as well as process chains, and it is anchored in multi-physical mechanisms such that new hybrid-AM processes can be freely and systematically sought or invented through a systems approach epitomized by the property - mechanism - energy source - hybrid-AM process (PMEH) thought process. The sequence of driving forces in this framework are as such: desired material properties determine which mechanism is utilized and, in turn, the energy source to be applied, which ultimately defines the hybrid-AM process. The five unifying physical mechanisms that were identified in this study are: melt pool dynamics, microstructure development, stress state, surface evolution, and thermal gradients. Analysis of properties, mechanisms, energy sources, and processes was conducted on more than 100 papers, and the results ultimately show the effect of mechanisms on material properties. Mechanisms are further classified by energy source, which are in turn broken down by hybrid-AM process. Additionally, each mechanism was defined and reviewed in detail, highlighting the PMEH relationship for metal hybrid-AM materials. Further analysis compares reported mechanical property values for hybrid-AM processes to both AM only and wrought properties for 316 L, Alloy 718, and Titanium Gr 5. Finally, future directions of research as well as clear gaps in knowledge are identified, which includes lack of variety in utilized energy sources, lack of material diversity, process chain integration and improvement, and promising hybrid-AM processes. With the presented analysis and PMEH framework, it is determined that metal AM hybrid processes are well suited to address current problems and show promise in creating superior and versatile materials. Further growth in this field is expected to be exponential, and the developed PMEH framework will aid in framing these innovative processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available