4.5 Article

Numerical Simulation of Particle Size Influence on the Sintering Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Powders Fabricated by Binder Jet 3D Printing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 3705-3717

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-021-05709-0

Keywords

binder jet 3D printing; mean particle size; numerical simulation; sintering shrinkage; relative density

Funding

  1. Research and Development Plans in Key Areas of Guangdong Province, China [2018B090905002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that as the average particle size increased, the maximum sintering stress, volumetric shrinkage, and relative density all decreased.
Binder jet 3D printing (BJ3DP) is one of the most promising 3D printing technologies, due to its ability of printing large-scale complex parts with high efficiency and low cost. The powder particle size is crucial for the sintering quality of BJ3DP. In this work, on the basis of the constitutive model of viscoplastic theory, the shape evolution (shrinkage and relative density) of cubes produced by BJ3DP using 316L stainless steel powders (normal distribution of powder sizes) with different mean particle sizes (i.e., 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 mu m) was studied via finite element numerical simulation during sintering. It revealed that the volumetric shrinkage, relative density, and maximum sintering stress decreased with increasing the mean particle size. The maximum sintering stress of the sample with mean particle size of 70 mu m was 0.0492 MPa, with the volumetric shrinkage of similar to 40% and the relative density of similar to 89%. In the meantime, the maximum sintering stress of the sample with mean particle size of 20 mu m was 0.1789 MPa, with the volumetric shrinkage of similar to 48% and the relative density of similar to 97%. In addition, the simulated results of the relative density of assumed samples agreed well with the experimental results from the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available