4.5 Article

Reducing Taper Fretting Corrosion in Artificial Hip Joints Using a PEEK Femoral Head

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 4619-4628

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-021-05766-5

Keywords

corrosion; taper fretting; Ti6Al4V; PEEK

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1101803]
  2. 333 High-level Talents Training Project of Jiangsu Province [BRA2019063]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875564, 51705517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using PEEK instead of CoCrMo as the head material for hip joint prostheses can significantly reduce fretting corrosion rate and improve corrosion resistance. Additionally, CoCrMo material released a higher quantity of metal ions in the lubricating medium compared to PEEK material.
PEEK has been gradually proposed for the manufacture of artificial joint prostheses in recent years due to its advantages such as good wear resistance, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. To study the effect of PEEK instead of CoCrMo as the head of the hip joint on the fretting corrosion resistance, fretting corrosion experiments were performed on PEEK-Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo-Ti6Al4V to simulate the fretting corrosion characteristics of PEEK hip joint prosthesis and CoCrMo hip joint prosthesis in the taper connection. The results show that PEEK-Ti6Al4V had a significantly lower fretting corrosion current than CoCrMo-Ti6Al4V, which indicates that the PEEK hip prosthesis had a significantly lower fretting corrosion rate than the CoCrMo hip prosthesis. However, the corrosion potential of PEEK-Ti6Al4V was significantly higher than that of CoCrMo-Ti6Al4V, which indicates that PEEK hip prosthesis has stronger corrosion resistance. CoCrMo-Ti6Al4V released more types and quantities of metal ions in the lubricating medium, and the total metal ion release is 4.19 times that of PEEK-Ti6Al4V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available