4.7 Article

Maintenance costs and makespan minimization for assembly permutation flow shop scheduling by considering preventive and corrective maintenance

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 549-564

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.020

Keywords

Assembly permutation; Bi-objective flow shop; Preventive maintenance; Corrective maintenance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875421]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science
  3. Andalusian Government
  4. National Agency for Research Funding AEI
  5. ERDF under grant EXASOCO [PGC2018101216BI00]
  6. ERDF under grant SIMARK [P18-TP-4475]
  7. ERDF [RYC201619800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study addresses the biobjective joint optimization of preventive maintenance and corrective maintenance costs in assembly permutation flow shop scheduling, proposing a new MILP model and RIPG algorithm to solve the problem. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the RIPG algorithm over four well-known multi-objective metaheuristics.
The joint optimization of production scheduling and maintenance planning has a significant influence on production continuity and machine reliability. However, limited research considers preventive maintenance (PM) and corrective maintenance (CM) in assembly permutation flow shop scheduling. This paper addresses the biobjective joint optimization of both PM and CM costs in assembly permutation flow shop scheduling. We also propose a new mixed integer linear programming model for the minimization of the makespan and maintenance costs. Two lemmas are inferred to relax the expected number of failures and CM cost to make the model linear. A restarted iterated Pareto greedy (RIPG) algorithm is applied to solve the problem by including a new evaluation of the solutions, based on a PM strategy. The RIPG algorithm makes use of novel bi-objective-oriented greedy and referenced local search phases to find non-dominated solutions. Three types of experiments are conducted to evaluate the proposed MILP model and the performance of the RIPG algorithm. In the first experiment, the MILP model is solved with an epsilon-constraint method, showing the effectiveness of the MILP model in small-scale instances. In the remaining two experiments, the RIPG algorithm shows its superiority for all the instances with respect to four well-known multi-objective metaheuristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available