Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.PI-RADS 3 Lesions: Role of Prostate MRI Texture Analysis in the Identification of Prostate Cancer
Dario Giambelluca et al.
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY (2021)
Cancer statistics, 2020
Rebecca L. Siegel et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2020)
T2w-MRI signal normalization affects radiomics features reproducibility
Elisa Scalco et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2020)
Prostate MRI radiomics: A systematic review and radiomic quality score assessment
Arnaldo Stanzione et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2020)
Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Niranjan J. Sathianathen et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2020)
The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping
Alex Zwanenburg et al.
RADIOLOGY (2020)
Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions
Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2020)
Prostate MRI radiomics: A systematic review and radiomic quality score assessment (vol 29, 109095, 2020)
Arnaldo Stanzione et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2020)
Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2
Tong Chen et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2019)
Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center
Isabeau Hermie et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2019)
Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
Stefanie J. Hectors et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2019)
Repeatability of Multiparametric Prostate MRI Radiomics Features
Michael Schwier et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2019)
The value of MR textural analysis in prostate cancer
N. Patel et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2019)
Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
Alison D. Sheridan et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2018)
Which scores need a core? An evaluation of MR-targeted biopsy yield by PIRADS score across different biopsy indications
Niranjan J. Sathianathen et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2018)
Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer
Jing Wang et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2017)
Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy
Marco Borghesi et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies
Jan Philipp Radtke et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer
Nelly Tan et al.
RADIOLOGY (2017)
Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype
Joost J. M. van Griethuysen et al.
CANCER RESEARCH (2017)
Role of mpMRI of the prostate in screening for prostate cancer
Christopher J. D. Wallis et al.
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY (2017)
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
Jeffrey C. Weinreb et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz et al.
RADIOLOGY (2016)
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Robert J. Gillies et al.
RADIOLOGY (2016)
Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images
Duc Fehr et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
F-18-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi-Cancer Site Patient Cohort
Mathieu Hatt et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2015)
Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies
Morgan R. Pokorny et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer
Stacy Loeb et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
Tumor Texture Analysis in 18F-FDG PET: Relationships Between Texture Parameters, Histogram Indices, Standardized Uptake Values, Metabolic Volumes, and Total Lesion Glycolysis
Fanny Orlhac et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2014)
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Jelle O. Barentsz et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2012)
Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification
G Collewet et al.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2004)