4.5 Article

A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model for Aeneolamia varia (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) Populations in Sugarcane Crops

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab017

Keywords

pest insect; population management threshold; Random Forest; genetic algorithm

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the effects of climate variables on sugarcane spittlebug adult populations, identifying evaporation, evapotranspiration, and cloudiness as the main climatic factors influencing the populations. These results provide a new perspective for decision-making in the preventive management of spittlebugs in sugarcane crops.
Sugarcane spittlebugs are considered important pests in sugarcane crops ranging from the southeastern United States to northern Argentina. To evaluate the effects of climate variables on adult populations of Aeneolamia varia (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae), a 3-yr monitoring study was carried out in sugarcane fields at week-long intervals during the rainy season (May to November 2005-2007). The resulting data were analyzed using the univariate Forest-Genetic method. The best predictive model explained 75.8% variability in physiological damage threshold. It predicted that the main climatic factors influencing the adult population would be, in order of importance, evaporation; evapotranspiration by 0.5; evapotranspiration, cloudiness at 2:00 p.m.; average sunshine and relative humidity at 8:00 a.m. The optimization of the predictive model established that the lower and upper limits of the climatic variables produced a threshold in the population development rate of 184 to 267 adult insects under the agroecological conditions of the study area.These results provide a new perspective on decision-making in the preventive management of A. varia adults in sugarcane crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available