4.7 Article

Topical Imiquimod Does Not Provide an Adjuvant Effect When Administered With Inactivated Influenza A/H5N1 Vaccine in Healthy Young Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 224, Issue 10, Pages 1712-1719

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab206

Keywords

topical; adjuvant; influenza; vaccine

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HHSN272201300015I, HHSN272201500002C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study concluded that the combination of topical imiquimod with ID MIV A/H5N1 was safe but did not result in improved serologic responses to the vaccine.
Background. Safe, effective, and easy to deploy adjuvants are needed for influenza prepandemic preparedness. Based on recent reports, we hypothesized that preapplication of topical imiquimod followed by intradermal (ID) vaccination with monovalent inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine (MIV A/H5N1) results in improved serologic responses. Methods. We randomized 50 healthy adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive topical imiquimod (group 1) or control cream (group 2) followed by ID injection of 9 mu g of the hemagglutinin MIV A/H5N1 in 2 doses, 21 days apart. Subjects were followed for safety and serologic responses as measured by the hemagglutination inhibition (I IAI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. Results. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were comparable between groups 1 and 2, and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. At 21 days after dose 2, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of HAI antibodies against the vaccine strain were 16.2 and 24.3 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The MN antibody GMTs were 9.3 and 10.7 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There were no significant differences in antibody levels between groups at study time points. Conclusions. Topical imiquimod administration combined with ID MIV A/H5N1 was safe but did not result in improved serologic responses to the vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available