4.5 Article

Evaluation of GEOS Precipitation Flagging for SMAP Soil Moisture Retrieval Accuracy

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 1317-1332

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-20-0038.1

Keywords

Precipitation; Soil moisture; Algorithms; Remote sensing; Satellite observations; Numerical weather prediction; forecasting

Funding

  1. SMAP Project
  2. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precipitation flag in the SMAP Level 2 passive soil moisture retrieval product is based on GEOS model forecasts and compared to IMERG satellite precipitation estimates, showing that IMERG has higher spatial variability and more light precipitation. However, replacing GEOS precipitation forecasts with IMERG measurements has minimal impact on the accuracy of soil moisture detection in the L2SMP product.
The precipitation flag in the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Level 2 passive soil moisture (L2SMP) retrieval product indicates the presence or absence of heavy precipitation at the time of the SMAP overpass. The flag is based on precipitation estimates from the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Forward Processing numerical weather prediction system. An error in flagging during an active or recent precipitation event can produce either 1) an overestimation of soil moisture due to short-term surface wetting of vegetation and/or surface ponding (if soil moisture retrieval was attempted in the presence of rain) or 2) an unnecessary nonretrieval of soil moisture and loss of data (if retrieval is flagged due to an erroneous indication of rain). Satellite precipitation estimates from the Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), version 06, Early Run (latency of similar to 4 h) precipitationCal product are used here to evaluate the GEOS-based precipitation flag in the L2SMP product for both the 1800 local time (LT) ascending and 0600 LT descending SMAP overpasses over the first five years of the mission (2015-20). Consisting of blended precipitation measurements from the Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) satellite constellation, IMERG is treated as the truth when comparing to the GEOS model forecasts of precipitation used by SMAP. Key results include (i) IMERG measurements generally show higher spatial variability than the GEOS forecast precipitation, (ii) the IMERG product has a higher frequency of light precipitation amounts, and (iii) the effect of incorporating IMERG rainfall measurements in lieu of GEOS precipitation forecasts are minimal on the L2SMP retrieval accuracy (determined vs in situ soil moisture measurements at core validation sites). Our results indicate that L2SMP retrievals continue to meet the mission's accuracy requirement [standard deviation of the unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) less than 0.04 m(3) m(-3)].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available