4.3 Article

Effect of inflow conditions on the free-surface properties of hydraulic jumps

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 1004-1017

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2020.1866692

Keywords

Air-water flows; free-surface profile; hydraulic jumps; inflow conditions; jump toe movements; LIDAR technology; physical modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research has shown that the inflow conditions upstream of hydraulic jumps can affect flow aeration, bed pressures and turbulence. Detailed measurements of the free-surface features in fully aerated hydraulic jumps with partially and fully developed inflow conditions have been conducted. The results indicate that the inflow conditions strongly influence the free-surface profile, roller length, free-surface and jump toe movements.
Previous research has shown that the inflow conditions upstream of hydraulic jumps can affect flow aeration, bed pressures and turbulence. However, studies of the effects of inflow conditions on free-surface properties have not been conclusive and have lacked a comparison of partially and fully developed inflow conditions. Detailed measurements of the free-surface features in fully aerated hydraulic jumps with partially and fully developed inflow conditions have been conducted using a LIDAR. The results showed that the free-surface profile, the roller length, the free-surface and jump toe movements are strongly influenced by the inflow conditions. Hydraulic jumps with fully developed inflow conditions were of comparatively shorter length compared to partially developed hydraulic jumps, while they were characterized by stronger fluctuations, jump toe motions and frequencies as well as stronger energy loss across the hydraulic jump. Inflow conditions must be considered in determining the envelope of hydraulic jump motions with consequences for dissipator design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available