4.7 Article

Effective separation of chromium species in technological solutions using amino-immobilized silica prior to their determination

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 407, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124383

Keywords

Chromium speciation; Separation; Immobilized silica; Polyamines; Technological solutions; ICP-OES and ICP-MS determination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amino-immobilized silicas were used for the first time for chromium speciation. The results showed that this method can effectively separate Cr(VI) and Cr(III) with good application prospects in technological solutions.
Amino-immobilized (poly(4,9-dioxadodecane-1,12-guanidine, polydiallyldimethylammonium, hexadimethrin bromide, polyhexamethylene guanidine) silicas were proposed for chromium speciation for the first time. Adsorbents surface was characterized by TGA-DSC, FT-IR, CHN, XRD and SEM analysis. Polyamines were strongly fixed on the silica surface and were not washed off with solutions of 3M HNO3 and 20 g L-1 NaCl. Amino-immobilized silica quantitatively removed (R >= 99%) Cr(VI) from solutions at pH 4-7. Cr(III) was not recovered in this pH range, which makes it possible to separate Cr(VI) from Cr(III). The separation factor (K-Cr(VI)/Cr(III)) was >= 1.10(4). Silica-based adsorbents layer-by-layer immobilized with polyamines and 2-(1,8-dihydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2-naphthylazo)benzenearsonic acid were proposed for quantitative removal of Cr(III) from aqueous solutions with pH 4-6 at 90 degrees C. A system of sequentially connected columns filled with selective adsorbents was used to separate the chromium species in stream at pH = 5 and a flow rate of 1 mL min(-1). Chromium was determined after its elution with 5 mL of 2 M HNO3 at a flow rate of 1 mL min(-1) using ICP-OES or ICP-MS. The preconcentration factors for Cr(VI) and Cr(III) was 60. A two-column system was used for chromium speciation in technological solutions. The efficiency of chromium speciation was confirmed by state standard procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available