4.6 Review

Discharge Practices for COVID-19 Patients: Rapid Review of Published Guidance and Synthesis of Documents and Practices at 22 US Academic Medical Centers

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1715-1721

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06711-x

Keywords

COVID-19; transitions of care; discharge practices; practice guidelines

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed current practices and synthesized common discharge practices for COVID-19 patients from both home and non-home settings, showing consensus on clinical criteria, social support, and post-discharge monitoring among US academic medical centers.
Background There are currently no evidence-based guidelines that provide standardized criteria for the discharge of COVID-19 patients from the hospital. Objective To address this gap in practice guidance, we reviewed published guidance and collected discharge protocols and procedures to identify and synthesize common practices. Design Rapid review of existing guidance from US and non-US public health organizations and professional societies and qualitative review using content analysis of discharge documents collected from a national sample of US academic medical centers with follow-up survey of hospital leaders Setting and Participants We reviewed 65 websites for major professional societies and public health organizations and collected documents from 22 Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) in the US participating in the HOspital MEdicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN). Results We synthesized data regarding common practices around 5 major domains: (1) isolation and transmission mitigation; (2) criteria for discharge to non-home settings including skilled nursing, assisted living, or homeless; (3) clinical criteria for discharge including oxygenation levels, fever, and symptom improvement; (4) social support and ability to perform activities of daily living; (5) post-discharge instructions, monitoring, and follow-up. Limitations We used streamlined methods for rapid review of published guidance and collected discharge documents only in a focused sample of US academic medical centers. Conclusion AMCs studied showed strong consensus on discharge practices for COVID-19 patients related to post-discharge isolation and transmission mitigation for home and non-home settings. There was high concordance among AMCs that discharge practices should address COVID-19-specific factors in clinical, functional, and post-discharge monitoring domains although definitions and details varied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available