4.7 Article

Shock polars for ideal and non-ideal gases

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 916, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.147

Keywords

shock waves; high-speed flow

Funding

  1. Taiwan MOST [108-2115-M-001-002-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For an ideal non-polytropic gas, shock polars have a unique critical shock that is always transonic. Temperature, pressure, energy, enthalpy, normal mass flux, and entropy increase along the forward Hugoniot curves, while speed and Mach number decrease along the entire polar. Non-convex equations of state can lead to multiple critical shocks, causing theoretical problems and practical risks.
We show that shock polars for an ideal non-polytropic gas (thermally but not calorically perfect) have a unique velocity angle maximum, the critical shock, assuming a convex equation of state (positive fundamental derivative) and other standard conditions. We also show that the critical shock is always transonic. These properties are explained by a brief informal mass flux argument, which is then extended into a precise calculation. In the process we show that temperature, pressure, energy, enthalpy, normal mass flux and entropy are increasing along the forward Hugoniot curves, and hence along the polar from vanishing to normal shock; speed is decreasing along the entire polar, mass flux and, importantly, Mach number are decreasing on subsonic parts of the polar. If the equation of state is not convex, counterexamples can be given with multiple critical shocks, permitting more than two shocks that attain the same velocity angle, in particular, more than one shock of weak type, which would cause theoretical problems and practical risks of misprediction. For dissociating diatomic gases, numerical experiments suggest that positive fundamental derivative and uniqueness of critical shocks hold at all realistic pressures, although both fail at very low purely theoretical pressures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available