4.3 Article

Porcupine/Wntless-dependent trafficking of the conserved WntA ligand in butterflies

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.23046

Keywords

butterfly wings; color pattern formation; porcupine; WntA; Wnt acylation; Wnt family evolution; Wnt trafficking; Wntless; Evi; Sprinter

Funding

  1. Division of Integrative Organismal Systems [IOS-1656553, IOS-1755329]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals the evolutionary dynamics of the WntA subfamily, which evolved at the base of the Bilateria + Cnidaria clade, conserving the core Wnt secretory pathway and unique amino acid residues; The WntA gene has been lost three times within arthropods, but still functional in beetles and butterflies.
Wnt ligands are key signaling molecules in animals, but little is known about the evolutionary dynamics and mode of action of the WntA orthologs, which are not present in the vertebrates or in Drosophila. Here we show that the WntA subfamily evolved at the base of the Bilateria + Cnidaria clade, and conserved the thumb region and Ser209 acylation site present in most other Wnts, suggesting WntA requires the core Wnt secretory pathway. WntA proteins are distinguishable from other Wnts by a synapomorphic Iso/Val/Ala216 amino-acid residue that replaces the otherwise ubiquitous Thr216 position. WntA embryonic expression is conserved between beetles and butterflies, suggesting functionality, but the WntA gene was lost three times within arthropods, in podoplean copepods, in the cyclorrhaphan fly radiation, and in ensiferan crickets and katydids. Finally, CRISPR mosaic knockouts (KOs) of porcupine and wntless phenocopied the pattern-specific effects of WntA KOs in the wings of Vanessa cardui butterflies. These results highlight the molecular conservation of the WntA protein across invertebrates, and imply it functions as a typical Wnt ligand that is acylated and secreted through the Porcupine/Wntless secretory pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available