4.7 Article

Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies protect against multiple tick-borne flaviviruses

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 218, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20210174

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI073755, P41GM103422, R24GM136766, T32AI007172, 75N93019C00062, HHSN272201400058C, HHSN 272201700060C, HHSN272201400018C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a panel of neutralizing anti-POWV antibodies, some of which exhibit cross-reactivity to other flaviviruses. The experiments showed that these antibodies can protect mice against POWV infection when used as prophylaxis or postexposure therapy, and some antibodies also have protective effects against other tick-transmitted flaviviruses.
Although Powassan virus (POWV) is an emerging tick-transmitted flavivirus that causes severe or fatal neuroinvasive disease in humans, medical countermeasures have not yet been developed. Here, we developed a panel of neutralizing anti-POWV mAbs recognizing six distinct antigenic sites. The most potent of these mAbs bind sites within domain II or III of the envelope (E) protein and inhibit postattachment viral entry steps. A subset of these mAbs cross-react with other flaviviruses. Both POWV type-specific and cross-reactive neutralizing mAbs confer protection in mice against POWV infection when given as prophylaxis or postexposure therapy. Several cross-reactive mAbs mapping to either domain II or III also protect in vivo against heterologous tick-transmitted flaviviruses including Langat and tick-borne encephalitis virus. Our experiments define structural and functional correlates of antibody protection against POWV infection and identify epitopes targeted by broadly neutralizing antibodies with therapeutic potential against multiple tick-borne flaviviruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available