4.4 Article

Thermogravimetric Devolatilization Behavior of Agricultural Residue for Generation of Syngas

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4050578

Keywords

thermogravimetric analysis; biomass; gasification; thermal decomposition; agricultural waste utilization; alternative energy sources; energy conversion; systems; renewable energy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal degradation characteristics of eucalyptus, pearl millet cob, and corncob were investigated using the nonisothermal thermogravimetric method to understand their thermal devolatilization behavior and estimation of various thermophysical properties. The activation energy using the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method has been estimated and corncob was found to be the easiest for thermochemical conversion among the three biomasses. The TG analysis and activation energy indicated the favorable conversion properties of corncob.
The thermal degradation characteristics of eucalyptus, pearl millet cob, and corncob were investigated using the nonisothermal thermogravimetric method. This investigation was performed to carry out the thermochemical conversion for obtaining syngas. Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) analyses were carried out to understand thermal devolatilization behavior and estimation of various thermophysical properties of the biomasses. The degradation behavior was analyzed in the light of lignocellulosic composition that was found to have a definitive influence on degradation outcomes. The TG analysis has been utilized to obtain the proximate analysis of biomass. Activation energy using the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method has been estimated and found to be 201, 150, and 68 kJ/mol for eucalyptus, pearl millet cob, and corncob, respectively. The TG analysis and activation energy together indicated that corncob is easiest for thermochemical conversion among the three biomasses. The TG curve also confirms the same.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available