4.4 Article

Real-time use of a computer-aided system for polyp detection during colonoscopy, an ambispective study

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 256-262

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12985

Keywords

adenoma detection rate; colonoscopy; computer‐ aided detection system; polyp detection rate; polyp per colonoscopy

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2017YFC1308800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the real-time CADe system significantly increased the PDR and PPC under conditions of high polyp detection rate, indicating that CADe-assisted colonoscopy can enhance polyp detection rate.
Objective This study aimed to evaluate ambispectively the effectiveness of a real-time computer-aided detection (CADe) system on the number of polyp (PPC) or adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), and polyp (PDR) or adenoma detection rate (ADR). Methods Eight-five videos marked using the CADe system, together with the unmarked videos, were reviewed by two senior endoscopists. Polyps detected in the marked and unmarked videos were recounted in parallel. Additionally, 128 consecutive patients were enrolled for a prospective evaluation using a standard colonoscopy or the CADe monitor alternately every 2 weeks. The PC, APC, PDR and ADR were compared between the two groups. Results The total number of polyps reported in the unmarked and marked videos were 73 and 88, respectively (mean PPC 0.86 vs 1.04, P = 0.001). The proportion of polyps detected per colonoscopy increased by 20.5%. Of the 128 prospectively enrolled patients, 186 polyps were detected. The mean PPC was higher in the CADe colonoscopy than in the standard colonoscopy (1.66 vs 1.13, P = 0.039). The PDR using the CADe colonoscopy was significantly higher than that of the standard colonoscopy (78.1% vs 56.3%, P = 0.008). Conclusion Real-time CADe system significantly increases the PDR and PPC under the situation of a high rate of polyp detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available