4.2 Article

Adolescents Treated for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Pediatric Primary Care: Characterizing Risk for Stimulant Diversion

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000923

Keywords

stimulant diversion; pediatric primary care; attention-deficit; hyperactivity disorder

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [U01DA040213]
  2. [DA035464]
  3. [DA049721]
  4. [MH018951-26]
  5. [TR001856]
  6. [MH121585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study described the clinical and psychosocial characteristics of adolescents in pediatric primary care treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, focusing on the risk of stimulant diversion. Results showed that diversion was rare, but risk levels were higher for older adolescents, with minimal sex differences. Prevention measures could capitalize on current psychosocial strengths and discuss stimulant-specific attitudes, behaviors, and social norms to effectively address the risk of diversion.
Objective: To describe the clinical and psychosocial characteristics, and their hypothesized interrelations, as it pertains to risk for stimulant diversion (sharing, selling, or trading) for adolescents in pediatric primary care treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Methods: Baseline data for 341 adolescents in a cluster-randomized controlled trial of stimulant diversion prevention in pediatric primary care (NCT_03080259) were used to (1) characterize diversion and newly measured risk factors, (2) examine their associations with age and sex, and (3) test whether associations among risk factors were consistent with model-implied predictions. Data were collected through multi-informant electronic surveys from adolescents and parents. Results: Diversion was rare (1%) in this sample (M-age = 15, SD = 1.5, 74% male participants). Older age was associated with being approached to divert (r = 0.25, p < 0.001) and higher risk on variables pertinent to stimulant treatment, such as treatment disclosure (r = 0.12, p < 0.05), tolerance for stimulant misuse and diversion (r = 0.17, p < 0.05), and peer norms favorable to stimulant misuse and diversion (r values = 0.15-0.34, p < 0.001). Sex differences were minimal. Variables from our conceptual model and specific to stimulants (e.g., perceived likelihood of negative consequences from diversion and schoolmate stimulant misuse/diversion) were related in multivariable regressions to hypothesized immediate precursors of diversion (e.g., diversion intentions). Conclusion: Although diversion was rare for these primary care-treated adolescents, risk levels appear to be higher for older adolescents. Prevention may be most effective by capitalizing on current psychosocial strengths and discussing stimulant-specific attitudes, behaviors, and social norms before vulnerability to diversion increases in the final years of high school and into college.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available