4.5 Article

Comprehensive test of tabia at the Humen Fort sites in Guangdong, China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 298-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2021.03.005

Keywords

Humen Forts; Tabia; Comprehensive testing; C-S-H

Funding

  1. Conservation Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Cultural Heritage
  2. National key RAMP
  3. D Program of China [2020YFC1521804]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Humen Forts in Guangdong were built during the Jiaqing dynasty, featuring bases made with tabia. Modern inspection revealed some forts had high elastic modulus exceeding ordinary cement. Experimental tests showed that organic additives like sticky rice and protein influenced the material strength of tabia in the forts.
The Humen Forts, in Guangdong, were first built in the fifth year of Jiaqing dynasty (1801), and some of their bases were made using tabia. Modern inspection shows that the elastic modulus of some forts can reach 686.6 Mpa, a strength exceeding that of ordinary cement. To explore the fundamental cause of this high strength, we designed a set of comprehensive testing methods for the forts' tabia, using XRD and ELISA, conducting TG-DSC, and so forth. The experiments were conducted through on-site testing, sampling, and laboratory research on seven sites to explore the influence of the original ratio of tabia on the material strength. And successfully discovered that the techniques and materials used in the construction of the forts were unlike, some areas feature sticky rice and protein as the main organic additives. These tests will provide a reference for further research on the production process of tabia and the preparation of protective materials for the Forts' repair. (c) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available