4.6 Article

Measuring parity violation in the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the LISA-Taiji network

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/069

Keywords

gravitational wave detectors; gravitational waves / theory; gravitational waves / experiments

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/P000762/1, ST/T000791/1]
  2. Netherlands organization for scientific research (NWO) VIDI grant [639.042.730]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research Council [724659]
  4. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) through the 'Dipartimenti di eccellenza' project Science of the Universe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the possibility of detecting circular polarization of an isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background by cross-correlating two space-based detectors, LISA and Taiji, and finds that a clear measurement of chirality can be claimed for a maximally chiral flat signal with specific amplitude at the frequency scales of LISA and Taiji.
Parity violation is a powerful observable to distinguish a cosmological background of Gravitational Waves (GWs) from an astrophysical one. Planar single GW interferometers, both on ground and in space, are unable to measure the net circular polarization of an isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (SGWB). In this paper, we explore the possibility of detecting circular polarization of an isotropic SGWB by cross-correlating two space-based detectors planned to be launched around 2034: LISA and Taiji. We compute the response of such a network to chirality and we perform a Fisher forecast analysis on the I and V Stokes parameters for the SGWB. We find that a clear measurement of chirality can be claimed for a maximally chiral flat signal with amplitude h(2) Omega GW similar or equal to 10(-12) at the frequency scales of LISA and Taiji.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available