4.6 Article

Impacts of the physical data model on the forward inference of initial conditions from biased tracers

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/058

Keywords

cosmological parameters from LSS; galaxy clustering; redshift surveys

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2015-STG 678652]
  2. ILP LABEX - French state [ANR-10-LABX-63, ANR-11-IDEX-000402]
  3. ANR BIG4 project of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-16-CE23-0002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the cross-correlation coefficient between true and inferred phases reacts weakly to all ingredients, and the bias in the amplitude of the inferred initial conditions strongly depends on the bias model and the likelihood. The bias model and likelihood hold the key to an unbiased cosmological inference by controlling the systematic errors arising from marginalized sub-grid physics.
We investigate the impact of each ingredient in the employed physical data model on the Bayesian forward inference of initial conditions from biased tracers at the field level. Specifically, we use dark matter halos in a given cosmological simulation volume as tracers of the underlying matter density field. We study the effect of tracer density, grid resolution, gravity model, bias model and likelihood on the inferred initial conditions. We find that the cross-correlation coefficient between true and inferred phases reacts weakly to all ingredients above, and is well predicted by the theoretical expectation derived from a Gaussian model on a broad range of scales. The bias in the amplitude of the inferred initial conditions, on the other hand, depends strongly on the bias model and the likelihood. We conclude that the bias model and likelihood hold the key to an unbiased cosmological inference. Together they must keep the systematics - which arise from the sub-grid physics that are marginalized over - under control in order to obtain an unbiased inference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available