4.6 Article

Is asymptotically safe inflation eternal?

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/076

Keywords

inflation; initial conditions and eternal universe; transplanckian physics; quantum gravity phenomenology

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Center (NCN) [2018/29/N/ST2/01743]
  2. PL-Grid Infrastructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the relationship between eternal inflation and the asymptotic safety hypothesis in other approaches to quantum gravity. It reveals that there is no tension between eternal inflation and asymptotic safety in both the matter and gravitational sectors, contrary to string theory. Additionally, it suggests that eternal inflation is not possible within the range of applicability of effective field quantum gravity theory.
Recently, based on swampland considerations in string theory, the (no) eternal inflation principle has been put forward. The natural question arises whether similar conditions hold in other approaches to quantum gravity. In this article, the asymptotic safety hypothesis is considered in the context of eternal inflation. As exemplary inflationary models the SU(N) Yang-Mills in the Veneziano limit and various RG-improvements of the gravitational action are studied. The existence of UV fixed point generically flattens the potential and our findings suggest no tension between eternal inflation and asymptotic safety, both in the matter and gravitational sector in contradistinction to string theory. Moreover, the eternal inflation cannot take place in the range of applicability of effective field quantum gravity theory. We employ the analytical relations for eternal inflation to some of the models with single minima, such as Starobinsky inflation, alpha-attractors, or the RG-improved models and verify them with the massive numerical simulations. The validity of these constraints is also discussed for a multi-minima model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available