4.7 Review

Challenges with Utilizing the 1,3-Beta-D-Glucan and Galactomannan Assays To Diagnose Invasive Mold Infections in Immunocompromised Children

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03276-20

Keywords

immunocompromised children; beta-D-glucan; galactomannan; invasive mold infections

Categories

Funding

  1. IMMY diagnostics
  2. Vela diagnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing the diagnosis of invasive mold infections in immunocompromised children is challenging, with 1,3-beta-D-glucan showing limited accuracy in this population. However, serum and bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan can be used as diagnostic tools with comparable performance to adults.
Establishing the diagnosis of invasive mold infections (IMI) in immuno-compromised children is challenging due to nonspecific clinical presentations and the limited sensitivity of traditional culture-based methods. Rapid non-culture-based diagnostics such as the 1,3-beta-D-glucan and galactomannan assays have emerged as promising adjuncts to conventional diagnostic tests in adults. Available data suggest that 1,3-beta-D-glucan has limited accuracy in the pediatric population and is not recommended to be used for the diagnosis of IMI in children. On the other hand, the diagnostic performance of the serum and bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in immunocompromised children is comparable to results observed in adults and can be used as a screening tool in children at high risk of developing invasive aspergillosis (IA) who are not receiving mold-active antifungal prophylaxis and as a diagnostic tool in symptomatic children suspected of having IA. Herein, we summarize the available evidence for the use of these rapid non-culture-based diagnostics in immunocompromised children. We also summarize potential causes of false positivity for the 1,3-beta-D-glucan and galactomannan assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available