4.8 Review

The dark side of daylight: photoaging and the tumor microenvironment in melanoma progression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI143763

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA174746, R01CA207935, P01 CA114046, R01CA232256]
  2. Bloomberg Distinguished Professorship
  3. EV McCollum Endowed Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The continued thinning of the atmospheric ozone layer leads to increased levels of ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth's surface, which in turn results in a higher incidence of skin cancer. Ultraviolet radiation not only promotes skin carcinogenesis and photoaging, but its effects on the skin microenvironment in facilitating melanoma progression remain largely unexplored.
Continued thinning of the atmospheric ozone, which protects the earth from damaging ultraviolet radiation (UVR), will result in elevated levels of UVR reaching the earth's surface, leading to a drastic increase in the incidence of skin cancer. In addition to promoting carcinogenesis in skin cells, UVR is a potent extrinsic driver of age-related changes in the skin known as photoaging. We are in the preliminary stages of understanding of the role of intrinsic aging in melanoma, and the tumor-permissive effects of photoaging on the skin microenvironment remain largely unexplored. In this Review, we provide an overview of the impact of UVR on the skin microenvironment, addressing changes that converge or diverge with those observed in intrinsic aging. Intrinsic and extrinsic aging promote phenotypic changes to skin cell populations that alter fundamental processes such as melanogenesis, extracellular matrix deposition, inflammation, and immune response. Given the relevance of these processes in cancer, we discuss how photoaging might render the skin microenvironment permissive to melanoma progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available