Journal
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages 4871-4892Publisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0791.1
Keywords
Arctic; Climate prediction; Temperature; Coupled models; Model evaluation/performance
Categories
Funding
- National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0603804]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971072, 41771069, 91937302, 41911530187]
- U.S. National Science Foundation [PLR-1901352]
- Swedish BECC
- Swedish MERGE
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study indicates that significant Arctic warming is expected in the future, but there are large intermodel spread and uncertainties in CMIP6 models, with the cold bias in the oceanic regions being the main contributor to model uncertainties.
The Arctic has experienced a warming rate higher than the global mean in the past decades, but previous studies show that there are large uncertainties associated with future Arctic temperature projections. In this study, near-surface mean temperatures in the Arctic are analyzed from 22 models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Compared with the ERA5 reanalysis, most CMIP6 models underestimate the observed mean temperature in the Arctic during 1979-2014. The largest cold biases are found over the Greenland Sea the Barents Sea, and the Kara Sea. Under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the multimodel ensemble mean of 22 CMIP6 models exhibits significant Arctic warming in the future and the warming rate is more than twice that of the global/Northern Hemisphere mean. Model spread is the largest contributor to the overall uncertainty in projections, which accounts for 55.4% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections in 2015 and remains at 32.9% at the end of projections in 2095. Internal variability uncertainty accounts for 39.3% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections but decreases to 6.5% at the end of the twenty-first century, while scenario uncertainty rapidly increases from 5.3% to 60.7% over the period from 2015 to 2095. It is found that the largest model uncertainties are consistent cold bias in the oceanic regions in the models, which is connected with excessive sea ice area caused by the weak Atlantic poleward heat transport. These results suggest that large intermodel spread and uncertainties exist in the CMIP6 models' simulation and projection of the Arctic near-surface temperature and that there are different responses over the ocean and land in the Arctic to greenhouse gas forcing. Future research needs to pay more attention to the different characteristics and mechanisms of Arctic Ocean and land warming to reduce the spread.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available