4.6 Article

Plasma suPAR is lowered by smoking cessation: a randomized controlled study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 305-311

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12593

Keywords

Biomarker; inflammation; lifestyle; prognosis; risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSoluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a stable inflammatory biomarker. In patients, suPAR is a marker of disease presence, severity and prognosis. In the general population, suPAR is predictive of disease development, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease and, in smokers, predictive of long-term lung cancer development. Whether smoking cessation impacts the suPAR level is unknown. Materials and MethodsForty-eight smokers were randomized into three groups of 16: (i) continued to smoke 20 cigarettes per day, (ii) refrained from smoking and used transdermal nicotine patches and (iii) refrained from smoking and used placebo patches. Nonsmokers were included for comparison. suPAR and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured by ELISA. ResultsAt baseline, the suPAR level was significantly higher in the 48 smokers (median 32 ng mL, IQR (25-39)) than in 46 never smokers (19 ng/mL (17-22)). In smokers randomized to smoking cessation, suPAR levels after 4 weeks of stopping were decreased and no longer significantly different from the never smokers values. SuPAR decreased in both those who received a placebo as well as nicotine patch. Interestingly, those with the highest suPAR level at time of smoking were also those with the highest level of suPAR after smoking cessation. In contrast, smoking or smoking cessation had no influence on CRP levels. ConclusionOur study suggests that the suPAR level may aid to personalize the risk of smoking by identifying those smokers with the highest risk of developing disease and who may have the most benefit of smoking cessation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available