4.7 Article

Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 298, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126779

Keywords

Green closed-loop supply chain; Fairness concern; Decision model; Profit-sharing contract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the decision-making process of a green closed-supply chain involving a manufacturer and a retailer. It analyzes the decisions and reasons of supply chain members under centralized and decentralized decision-making scenarios. The study finds that a profit-sharing contract can enhance the relationship between supply chain members and promote sustainable economic and environmental development.
This paper considers a green closed-supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. A Stackelberg game model of centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making with manufac-turer's fairness concern was constructed based on the consideration of retailer's sales effort. The decision-making of supply chain members under the above two situations and their reasons are analyzed in depth. According to the model, a green closed-loop supply chain with profit sharing contract coordination fairness is designed. Finally, the correctness of the model is verified by numerical simulation. We generate our findings from three aspects, as follows: when the manufacturer has fair concern behavior, it is not conducive to the environmental performance of green products, resulting in waste of resources, but also forcing retailers to reduce sales efforts and increase the retail price of products. Finally, the benefits of green closed-loop supply chain are seriously damaged. The profit-sharing contract could improve the relationship between members of the supply chain to achieve sustainable economic and environmental development. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available