4.7 Article

Analysis of subnational CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 293, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126203

Keywords

CO2 mitigation policy pressure; Carbon emissions reduction index (CERI); Refined laspeyres index (RLI); Urban-rural residential sector; China

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020NTST15, JBK2101038, JBK2001044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By developing the Carbon Emissions Reduction Index (CERI) and utilizing the refined Laspeyres technique, this study evaluated the CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector in 29 provinces and 286 cities in China. The results showed that although the average CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector was increasing, there were differences between provinces and cities, with CO2 intensity and inequality being key factors influencing the changes.
Evaluating CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector is key to effectively taking CO2 mitigation actions. By developing the carbon emissions reduction index (CERI) and applying the refined Laspeyres technique, this study qualified the Chinese residential CO2 mitigation policy pressure in 29 provinces and 286 cities from 2005 to 2015. The results showed that, although the average CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector showed a rise trend both at the provincial level and at the city level, the average CERI value and growth rate of the former was larger than the latter. Meanwhile, the CO2 mitigation policy pressure in the residential sector was both quite different with provinces and cities. Moreover, CO2 intensity contributed the most to the changes in the average CERI at the provincial level, while the main driver of the changes in the average CERI was CO2 inequality at the city level. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available