Introducing the Endowment-Practice-Institutions (EPI) framework for studying agency in the institutional contestation of socio-technical regimes

A timely transition of socio-technical systems to more sustainable alternatives is crucial in mitigating climate change and other environmental problems. While innovation plays a significant role in such transitions, policy makers and the scientific community have become increasingly aware that the deliberate destabilization of existing socio-technical regimes-including associated institutions and technologies-is also often necessary. However, such aspiration is politically contested. This paper presents the Endowment-Practice-Institutions (EPI) Framework to study the contestation of institutions underpinning socio-technical regimes. By integrating key theories from Institutional Sociology and Political Economy, the framework conceives actors' capability of influencing institutional structures to be dependent on their institutional work practices and the various endowments that enable these practices. We present Japanese coal policy as an example to illustrate how the framework can be used to assess actors' institutional work and their influence on institutional outcomes. In addition to providing new theoretical insights, the framework helps to systematically analyze agency-driven mechanisms pertinent for the maintenance or destabilization of socio-technical regimes. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Automated summary

A transition towards more sustainable alternatives in socio-technical systems is crucial for addressing climate change and other environmental issues. While innovation is important, deliberate destabilization of existing systems is sometimes necessary, even though it is politically controversial. The Endowment-Practice-Institutions (EPI) Framework integrates theories from Institutional Sociology and Political Economy to analyze how actors influence institutional structures through their practices and resources. This framework provides new theoretical insights and helps analyze agency-driven mechanisms for maintaining or destabilizing socio-technical regimes.