4.7 Article

Hartree-Fock critical nuclear charge in two-electron atoms

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 154, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0043105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New College, Oxford, through the Astor Junior Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron correlation effects are crucial in stabilizing two-electron atoms near the critical nuclear charge, and understanding them relies on a solid grasp of the uncorrelated Hartree-Fock description. By exploring different symmetry-restricted Hartree-Fock formalisms, we identified the nuclear charge where spin-symmetry breaking occurs, leading to an unrestricted wave function predicting inner and outer electrons. We also found closed-shell and unrestricted critical nuclear charges where the highest occupied orbital energy reaches zero and the electron density separates from the nucleus, highlighting the importance of fractional spin errors and static correlation for small nuclear charges.
Electron correlation effects play a key role in stabilizing two-electron atoms near the critical nuclear charge, representing the smallest charge required to bind two electrons. However, deciphering the importance of these effects relies on fully understanding the uncorrelated Hartree-Fock description. We investigate the properties of the ground state wave function in the small nuclear charge limit using various symmetry-restricted Hartree-Fock formalisms. We identify the nuclear charge where spin-symmetry breaking occurs to give an unrestricted wave function that predicts an inner and outer electron. We also identify closed-shell and unrestricted critical nuclear charges where the highest occupied orbital energy becomes zero and the electron density detaches from the nucleus. Finally, we identify the importance of fractional spin errors and static correlation for small nuclear charges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available