4.7 Article

Molecular Mechanisms of the Blockage of Glioblastoma Motility

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 2967-2980

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00279

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. project AgainstbRain cancEr: finding personalized therapies with in silico and in vitro strategies [D93D19000020007 POR FESR 2014 2020-1.3]
  2. FIRC-AIRC Mario e Valeria Rindi fellowship for Italy
  3. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [24514]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully reduced the infiltration propensity of GBM by using inhibitors of two small Rho GTPases, with all-atom simulations elucidating the molecular basis of their inhibition mechanism and providing valuable information for future drug discovery studies.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal brain tumor. GBM has a remarkable degree of motility and is able to infiltrate the healthy brain. In order to perform a rationale-based drug-repositioning study, we have used known inhibitors of two small Rho GTPases, Rac1 and Cdc42, which are upregulated in GBM and are involved in the signaling processes underlying the orchestration of the cytoskeleton and cellular motility. The selected inhibitors (R-ketorolac and ML141 for Cdc42 and Rketorolac and EHT 1864 for Rac1) have been successfully employed to reduce the infiltration propensity of GBM in live cell imaging studies. Complementarily, all-atom simulations have elucidated the molecular basis of their inhibition mechanism, identifying the binding sites targeted by the inhibitors and dissecting their impact on the small Rho GTPases' function. Our results demonstrate the potential of targeting the Rac1 and Cdc42 proteins with small molecules to contrast GBM infiltration growth and supply precious information for future drug discovery studies aiming to fight GBM and other infiltrative cancer types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available