4.5 Article

Trim9 and Klp61F promote polymerization of new dendritic microtubules along parallel microtubules

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 134, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.258437

Keywords

Kinesin; Microtubule; Polarity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM085115, GM076476]
  2. NIH T32 training grant [GM108563]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Axons and dendrites are distinguished by microtubule polarity, with dendrites containing minus-end-out microtubules and axons having plus-end-out microtubules. Trim9 and kinesin-5 work together at microtubule plus ends to promote new microtubule growth and resist catastrophe. Successful exit of microtubules at branch points depends on their orientation and parallel orientation with other microtubules.
Axons and dendrites are distinguished by microtubule polarity. In Drosophila, dendrites are dominated by minus-end-out microtubules, whereas axons contain plus-end-out microtubules. Local nucleation in dendrites generates microtubules in both orientations. To understand why dendritic nucleation does not disrupt polarity, we used live imaging to analyze the fate of microtubules generated at branch points. We found that they had different rates of success exiting the branch based on orientation: correctly oriented minus-end-out microtubules succeeded in leaving about twice as often as incorrectly oriented microtubules. Increased success relied on other microtubules in a parallel orientation. From a candidate screen, we identified Trim9 and kinesin-5 (Klp61F) as machinery that promoted growth of new microtubules. In S2 cells, Eb1 recruited Trim9 to microtubules. Klp61F promoted microtubule growth in vitro and in vivo, and could recruit Trim9 in S2 cells. In summary, the data argue that Trim9 and kinesin-5 act together at microtubule plus ends to help polymerizing microtubules parallel to pre-existing ones resist catastrophe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available