4.5 Editorial Material

Estimation of Stressed Blood Volume in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock From Acute Myocardial Infarction and Decompensated Heart Failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 1141-1145

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.002

Keywords

Cardiogenic shock; Hemodynamics; Stressed blood volume

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel computational method was used to estimate stressed blood volume in patients with cardiogenic shock. The findings suggest that eSBV correlates with shock severity, with higher eSBV observed in patients with heart failure and cardiogenic shock who died, while no significant difference was found in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Background: Sympathetically mediated redistribution of blood from the unstressed venous reservoir to the hemodynamically active stressed compartment is thought to contribute to congestion in cardiogenic shock (CS). We used a novel computational method to estimate stressed blood volume (SBV) in CS and assess its relationship with clinical outcomes. Methods and Results: Hemodynamic parameters including estimated SBV (eSBV) were compared among patients from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry with a complete set of hemodynamic data. eSBV was compared across shock etiologies (acute myocardial infarction and CS (AMI-CS) vs heart failure with CS (HF-CS), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage, and between survivors and nonsurvivors. Among 528 patients with patients analyzed, the mean eSBV was 2423 mL/70 kg and increased with increasing Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions stage (B, 2029 mL/70 kg; C, 2305 mL/70 kg; D, 2496 mL/70 kg; E, 2707 mL/70 kg; P < .001). The eSBV was significantly greater among patients with HF-CS who died compared with survivors (2733 vs 2357 mL/70 kg; P < .001), whereas no significant difference was observed between outcome groups in AMI-CS (2501 mL/ 70 kg vs 2384 mL/70 kg; P = .19). Conclusions: eSBV is a novel integrated index of congestion which correlates with shock severity. eSBV was higher in patients with HF-CS who died; no difference was observed in patients with AMI-CS, suggesting that congestion may play a more significant role in the deterioration of patients with HF-CS

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available