4.6 Article

Determining the band alignment of copper-oxide gallium-oxide heterostructures

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 129, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0036591

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via the RTG (Research Training Group) 2204 Substitute Materials for sustainable Energy Technologies
  2. European Regional Development Fonts (EFRE 2DIBS)
  3. Heisenberg programs [CH660/8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of copper oxides with gallium sesquioxide is considered an excellent heterojunction system for overcoming challenges in solar cell applications. Among the studied heterostructures, the Cu2O/α-Ga2O3 heterostructure appears to offer the most favorable band alignment for photovoltaic applications within the experimental margin of error.
The copper oxides cuprite (Cu2O) and tenorite (CuO) are ideal candidates for solar cells as they promise high conversion efficiencies according to the Shockley-Queisser limit. However, both cannot readily be doped n-type, thus hampering the formation of all copper oxide p-n junctions for solar cell applications. The combination of the copper oxides with gallium sesquioxide, in particular, alpha -Ga2O3 and beta -Ga2O3, is considered to be an excellent heterojunction system for overcoming this challenge. In such a p-n junction, the p-type copper oxide layer will act as an absorber and the transparent n-type gallium sesquioxide will act as a window layer. In these devices, the band alignment at the internal interface is crucial for the device performance. Here, we study the band alignments of four different copper oxide-gallium sesquioxide heterostructures by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Within the experimental margin of error, a Cu2O/alpha -Ga2O3 heterostructure appears to offer the most favorable band alignment for photovoltaic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available