4.6 Article

Comparison of the culture method with multiplex PCR for the confirmation of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages 2600-2609

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.15103

Keywords

confirmation; culture; identification; Legionella pneumophila; Legionella spp; multiplex PCR; serogroups; water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes the use of multiplex PCR to confirm Legionella colonies, allowing for faster detection of positive colonies with higher specificity. Analysis from two laboratories showed that the PCR technique has higher specificity.
Aims The detection and enumeration of Legionella spp. in water samples are typically performed via a cultural technique standardized in ISO 11731. This method is time-consuming (up to 15 days), and the specificity of the confirmation step is questionable. This study proposes the use of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm presumptive Legionella colonies directly from the culture plate; this shortens the response time by 2-5 days while still reporting results in colony forming units (CFU). Methods and Results Two laboratories analysed a total of 290 colonies to compare the confirmation step of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in accordance with ISO 11731 by culture growth and agglutination vs multiplex PCR. Discordant results were resolved by the swiss national reference laboratory. The data were evaluated following ISO 16140 and showed that the PCR-technique had higher specificity. Conclusions The confirmation of Legionella spp., L. pneumophila and L. pneumophila serogroup 1 by multiplex PCR allows detection of positive colonies more rapidly and with higher specificity. Significance and Impact of the Study The study highlights a possibility to shorten the response time significantly during the enumeration of Legionella spp. and achieving a higher specificity while adhering to the legally recognized reporting in CFU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available