4.5 Article

Cortical Thickness, Volume, and Surface Area in the Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 651-665

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201576

Keywords

Cognitive complaint; cortical thickness; gait; motoric cognitive risk

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NIA [1R56AG057548-01, R01AG057548-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals with MCR have lower overall cortical thickness, particularly in regions associated with human locomotion, social, cognitive, affective, and motor functions. Cortical atrophy in MCR is easier to detect in thickness than volume and surface area due to its sensitivity to aging processes.
Background: The motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome is a pre-clinical stage of dementia characterized by slow gait and cognitive complaint. Yet, the brain substrates of MCR are not well established. Objective: To examine cortical thickness, volume, and surface area associated with MCR in the MCR-Neuroimaging Consortium, which harmonizes image processing/analysis of multiple cohorts. Methods: Two-hundred MRIs (M age 72.62 years; 47.74%female; 33.17%MCR) from four different cohorts (50 each) were first processed with FreeSurfer 6.0, and then analyzed using multivariate and univariate general linear models with 1,000 bootstrapped samples (n-1; with resampling). All models adjusted for age, sex, education, white matter lesions, total intracranial volume, and study site. Results: Overall, cortical thickness was lower in individuals with MCR than in those without MCR. There was a trend in the same direction for cortical volume (p = 0.051). Regional cortical thickness was also lower among individuals with MCR than individuals without MCR in prefrontal, insular, temporal, and parietal regions. Conclusion: Cortical atrophy in MCR is pervasive, and include regions previously associated with human locomotion, but also social, cognitive, affective, and motor functions. Cortical atrophy in MCR is easier to detect in cortical thickness than volume and surface area because thickness is more affected by healthy and pathological aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available