4.7 Review

Use of Herbarium Voucher Specimens To Investigate Phytochemical Composition in Poisonous Plant Research

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 14, Pages 4037-4047

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00708

Keywords

poisonous plants; herbaria; voucher specimens; phytochemicals; alkaloids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poisonous plants have significant negative impacts on livestock, and studying them is complex due to the need for taxonomic classification, sufficient plant collection, and defining active principles. Herbarium specimens are important resources for analyzing chemical composition and identifying toxic plants in poisonous plant research.
Poisonous plants cause large losses to the livestock industry through death, reduced production efficiency, reproductive dysfunction, and compromised harvesting of rangeland and pasture forages. Research investigating poisonous plants is complex because there are hundreds of genera of toxic plants representing thousands of species. To investigate the effects of poisonous plants on livestock, a clear understanding of the taxonomic identity of the plant and the ability to collect the plant in sufficient quantities for scientific studies is required. Subsequently, the active principles must be defined and investigated in the taxa of interest to better predict risk and make recommendations to reduce losses. Herbaria are collections of preserved plant specimens and are an important resource in poisonous plant research. Voucher specimens have often been used in the identification of the plant for the experimental reproduction of suspected livestock poisoning associated with a spontaneous case. More recently, herbarium specimens have been used to investigate the chemical composition of toxic plants as well as the distribution of different chemotypes over the landscape. The primary purpose of this review is to highlight the chemical analysis of herbarium specimens in poisonous plant research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available