4.3 Article

Perinatal OUD Treatment Provider Understandings of Rural Patients' Experiences

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 177-182

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000858

Keywords

buprenorphine; health disparities; medication treatment; opioid use disorder; perinatal; rural treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the perspectives of substance use treatment providers in offering perinatal opioid use disorder treatment. It shows that providers have a good understanding of the challenges faced by patients seeking treatment and how this understanding informs patient-centered care.
Objectives: To present perspectives of substance use treatment providers offering perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in a largely rural, Appalachian region. To demonstrate the extent to which providers sought to understand their patients' experiences accessing treatment and how this understanding informed providers' approach to offering patient-centered care. Methods: A qualitative study combining semi-structured interviews and participant-observation with perinatal substance use treatment providers, conducted within a comprehensive program. Using purposive and opportunistic sampling with key informants (n = 10), a saturation sample was achieved. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory. Results: Perinatal substance use treatment providers had a good understanding of their patients' experiences seeking treatment for opioid use disorder, including being aware of obstacles patients encountered. This understanding allowed providers to better address patients' needs in and out of the clinic. Conclusions: Participants demonstrated a good understanding of what their largely rural, Appalachian patients experienced when attempting to access perinatal OUD treatment. This understanding may enable more patient-centered care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available