4.7 Article

Combined low-dose ipilimumab and pembrolizumab after sequential ipilimumab and pembrolizumab failure in advanced melanoma

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 182-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.003

Keywords

Ipilimumab; Pembrolizumab; Anti-PD-1; Melanoma; Combined immunotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Amgen
  3. BMS
  4. Roche
  5. Celgene
  6. GSK
  7. MedImmune
  8. MelaSciences
  9. Merck Serono
  10. Oncosec
  11. Eisai
  12. MSD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the wide use of anti-PD-1 therapy, an increasing number of patients progress under treatment. Combined immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies induces higher response rates as first-line treatment in comparison to single-agent therapy, however, with substantial toxicity since the combination of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg) induced 55% grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates of 39%. In this case series, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combined immunotherapy with low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) plus pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) in patients with metastatic melanoma with progressive disease under sequential monotherapy with both agents. All patients had received at least three lines of treatment, 78% of patients were M1c, and 67% had brain metastases. Stable disease was observed in 3 out of 9 patients with a median overall survival of 8 months after double checkpoint inhibition. No treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred, and none of the patients needed to discontinue the treatment due to toxicity. Further trials are needed to investigate combined immunotherapy as rescue treatment in heavily pre-treated melanoma patients to find optimal dosage in regard to outcome and toxicity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available