4.5 Article

Identification of novel inhibitors of GLUT1 by virtual screening and cell-based assays

Journal

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 1242-1255

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01109-2

Keywords

GLUT1; Glucose; Virtual screening; Inhibitors; Cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500620]
  2. high education key research project of Henan Province [19A180009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified four small molecules with novel scaffolds that can inhibit glucose uptake into cancer cells at the sub-micromole level, offering potential as anti-cancer drug candidates by manipulating energy metabolism.
In order to fuel the uncontrolled cell proliferation and division, tumor cells reprogram the energy metabolism to Warburg effect, where glucose is preferably converted by glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen. However, the high energetic demand of tumor cells require upregulating the expression of glucose transporters, notably GLUT1, which substantially increases glucose uptake into cytoplasm. GLUT1 is overexpressed in a variety of tumor cells and is likely to be a potential drug target in the treatment of pan-cancers. Although many small molecules were reported to inhibit the glucose uptake function by various measurements, several shortcomings such as weak binding affinity, low specificity of the known inhibitors demand the identification of alternative inhibitors with novel scaffolds. In this study, we performed a virtual screening campaign by docking each compound from Chemdiv database to the glucose binding pocket based on the crystal structure of GLUT1 (PDB ID 4PYP) and four small molecules with novel scaffolds were identified to inhibit the glucose uptake of cancer cells at the sub-micromole level. The identified compounds may serve as starting points for the development of anti-cancer drugs via the manipulation of the energy metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available