4.3 Article

Structure Domain Size of Carbon Fibers

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-021-02832-x

Keywords

Phonon; Raman spectrum; Structure domain size; Thermal reffusivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between internal micro-structure, thermal conductivity, and temperature variation of carbon fibers were systematically studied using the transient electrothermal technique. It was found that the internal structure of carbon fibers deteriorates below a critical temperature, leading to a different behavior in thermal conductivity variation with temperature. The thermal reffusivity theory was introduced to represent the structure domain size of carbon fibers by phonon mean free path at 0K.
The internal micro-structure is an important factor affecting the thermal conductivity of materials. In this work, the relationship between micro-structure, thermal conductivity, and temperature variation for carbon fibers (CF) are systematically studied by using the transient electrothermal technique. When the temperature is below the critical temperature (about 110 K), the internal structure of carbon fiber deteriorates, resulting in a very different behavior of thermal conductivity variation with temperature. By introducing the thermal reffusivity theory, the structure domain size of CF can be represented by the phonon mean free path at 0 K. The thermal reffusivity change of two temperature ranges is studied, and the mean free path of phonons in CF before and after deterioration can be calculated as 317 nm and 234 nm, respectively. The results are in good agreement with the crystallite grain size of 288 nm determined by Raman study. The thermal reffusivity provides another feasible method to study the relationship between structure domain size and thermophysical properties of materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available